Where can a family move that is not involved with this current state of world events?
August 13th, 2008 | by admin |john h asked:
I’m looking for a country that I can move my family to that is democratic and humane, I don’t agree with what is going on in this world and the united states current policies, i want a safe place to live in peace and raise my family.
Caffeinated Content
I’m looking for a country that I can move my family to that is democratic and humane, I don’t agree with what is going on in this world and the united states current policies, i want a safe place to live in peace and raise my family.
Caffeinated Content







16 Responses to “Where can a family move that is not involved with this current state of world events?”
By tunachunks199 on Aug 13, 2008 | Reply
Is usa really that bad?/?
By larry on Aug 16, 2008 | Reply
New Zealand…if you want freedom, good weather, natural beauty, an English-speaking population, and socialized medicine for everyone.
By mojojojo on Aug 19, 2008 | Reply
there is absolutely no place you can go where world events have no impact. You should not be thinking about where to go, you should be thinking about how to make the place where you are a better place.
By Leogirl0804 on Aug 22, 2008 | Reply
Sorry kiddo, you are out of luck. The terrorist have touched just about every country on this earth. Have a nice life. buh bye
By kelly24592 on Aug 23, 2008 | Reply
Mars.
North Pole.
You don’t like it here, get the hell out.
By Sweet Dreams on Aug 26, 2008 | Reply
canada, alaska
By sherryn on Aug 27, 2008 | Reply
Sorry, you’ll just have to suffer like to rest of us. If you are a billionaire, you could build a space station on some other planet & take your family there!
By musicalmarz on Aug 28, 2008 | Reply
dont run away. it won’t change if everyone does.
don’t uproot your family if you have kids or good friends…
By Future Resident on Aug 30, 2008 | Reply
Heaven or whatever afterlife you believe in.
By tabun1015 on Aug 31, 2008 | Reply
Norway
Sweden
Canada
Faeroe Islands
Barbados
Iceland
All of those places are pretty remote, democratic, and humane.
By mad john on Sep 4, 2008 | Reply
you could try Uranus
By jose c on Sep 6, 2008 | Reply
i would say Canada , but that’s still too close to the u.s try Australia .but at the current rate everything going we’ll all be in war in a few years.
By Mary T on Sep 9, 2008 | Reply
Good luck! Everyone has their problems
By snoodles on Sep 9, 2008 | Reply
you are pathetic!!! usa is a beautiful country!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By shorebreak on Sep 9, 2008 | Reply
I have a feeling that you’re out of luck.
The globalists have reached almost every nation on the planet. Those who are resistant to economic integration by private financial interests get placed in the crosshairs for extortion, followed by replacement of their government - by military force if necessary.
Nations like the US, Canada, New Zealand, the UK etc. have fallen to these private interests with hardly a whisper after their national media’s were purchased by these left leaning globalists. The goal is a single global economic system - as promised by President Bush in his 2006 “State of the Union” address.
Right now, we are experiencing a world at war. We are also experiencing the integration of regional economies - such as the EU, the African Union, the emerging Asian Union (which ASEAN members have recently been quietly discussing), the North American Union (which Canada, US, and Mexico are currently integrating under the name “Security and Prosperity Partnership”) and other efforts in South America.
Also in recent years, MEFTA has been at the top of the globalist agenda. The Middle East Free Trade Agreement. There are currently several members, along with many more who are fullfilling the US requirements for Free Trade status. The three nations most resistant are Lebanon, Syria, and Iran.
Once these economic foundations are fully in place, a world devastated by war will be given an offer similar to the offer that the globalists gave the world in 1945. A better United Nations. Only this time, using the utter destruction caused by recent conflict, many of the “usurped” nations such as the US, the UK, France, China, Russia, etc. will make a move towards “permanent peace” where they would place an offer on the table to surrender their militaries in favor of a single international force.
With a single economic foundation in place, a single military unfolding, and the world granted a sigh of relief because of the end of fighting, an offer will be made to coordinate the inner workings of governments, such as security and ID to prevent ongoing terrorism, and the eventual integration of policies.
These are the steps already taken by the EU, the Africa Union, and others - initially in the name of commerce. Military integration will occur in the name of peace. All will be conducted under the false facade of democracy, but in the meantime, the integration of gloabl commerce and population control is being perfected in China.
So I’m afraid that it doesn’t matter where you move your family. The empire is on the march and unless people wake up, we’re on the road to global tyranny. It might not look like Stalinism or Maoism when all is complete, but it will be a highly regulated society that will make liberty look like a pipe dream.
By aidamaria g on Sep 10, 2008 | Reply
Most of us would like that too, but is not possible, there is not one place in this world that is devoid of this current state of the world, we need to face it , we are in the most dangerous time in the history of our world. Even the animals are changing! The weather is unsatable, the planet is un balance, there is no where to go.